www-builds mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott O'Bryan" <darkar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
Date Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:58:58 GMT
Not sure it's been trademarked, but if it has, I'm pretty sure that it
doesn't apply to subdomains.  I'm okay with migrating the domain name,
but there should be a grace period.

Either way, the redirect will make sure the Jenkins name shows up for
everyone who cares .. :)

On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:

> I'd say get rid of hudsdon.a.o all together because Oracle is claiming the
> name as a trademark.
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jan Matèrne <apache@materne.de> wrote:
>
>> +1 for Jenkins
>> +1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao
>>
>> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated".
>>
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org]
>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21
>>> An: builds@apache.org
>>> Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
>>>
>>> +1 for jenkins
>>>
>>> for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then
>>> which one I don't care that much.
>>>
>>> Nicolas
>>>
>>> Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit :
>>>
>>>> +1 for Jenkins.  +1 for a redirect.
>>>>
>>>> Nige
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
>>> <niklas@protocol7.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle
:
>>> IMHO
>>>>>>> the most active is the Jenkins one)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins has
>>>>>> released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL slaves not
>>>>>> reconnecting correctly. This is a problem we currently have with
>>> our
>>>>>> Windows slave and that I would see fixed. So, unless anyone
>>> objects, I
>>>>>> will look into upgrading to Jenkins 1.396 in the near future.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In my opinion, this has low priority. The major reason for renaming
>>>>>> would probably be to make a stand in the Hudson vs Jenkins
>>> situation.
>>>>>
>>>>> :-) why not a redirect from hudson.a.o to jenkins.a.o ?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /niklas
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message