www-builds mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott O'Bryan" <darkar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
Date Fri, 04 Feb 2011 03:43:17 GMT
Totally agree.

On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com> wrote:

> Folks, by all means choose another name, but please don't drag
> 'trademark' into it.
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:
>> Actually, the reason Apache chose the "jakarta" project is because they
>> didn't want to use "java" in the subdomain name.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure it's been trademarked, but if it has, I'm pretty sure that it
>>> doesn't apply to subdomains.  I'm okay with migrating the domain name,
>>> but there should be a grace period.
>>>
>>> Either way, the redirect will make sure the Jenkins name shows up for
>>> everyone who cares .. :)
>>>
>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd say get rid of hudsdon.a.o all together because Oracle is claiming
>>> the
>>>> name as a trademark.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jan Matèrne <apache@materne.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 for Jenkins
>>>>> +1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao
>>>>>
>>>>> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org]
>>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21
>>>>>> An: builds@apache.org
>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for jenkins
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then
>>>>>> which one I don't care that much.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nicolas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for Jenkins.  +1 for a redirect.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nige
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
>>>>>> <niklas@protocol7.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins
or Oracle :
>>>>>> IMHO
>>>>>>>>>> the most active is the Jenkins one)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch.
Jenkins has
>>>>>>>>> released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL
slaves not
>>>>>>>>> reconnecting correctly. This is a problem we currently
have with
>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>> Windows slave and that I would see fixed. So, unless
anyone
>>>>>> objects, I
>>>>>>>>> will look into upgrading to Jenkins 1.396 in the near
future.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> * do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, this has low priority. The major reason
for renaming
>>>>>>>>> would probably be to make a stand in the Hudson vs Jenkins
>>>>>> situation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> :-) why not a redirect from hudson.a.o to jenkins.a.o ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /niklas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>

Mime
View raw message