www-builds mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott O'Bryan" <darkar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
Date Fri, 04 Feb 2011 03:42:52 GMT
Fair enough Paul, but that was a preference.  They would not have been
sued for trademark violations over the name java.

On Feb 3, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:

> Actually, the reason Apache chose the "jakarta" project is because they
> didn't want to use "java" in the subdomain name.
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Not sure it's been trademarked, but if it has, I'm pretty sure that it
>> doesn't apply to subdomains.  I'm okay with migrating the domain name,
>> but there should be a grace period.
>>
>> Either way, the redirect will make sure the Jenkins name shows up for
>> everyone who cares .. :)
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd say get rid of hudsdon.a.o all together because Oracle is claiming
>> the
>>> name as a trademark.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jan Matèrne <apache@materne.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for Jenkins
>>>> +1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao
>>>>
>>>> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lalevee@hibnet.org]
>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21
>>>>> An: builds@apache.org
>>>>> Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for jenkins
>>>>>
>>>>> for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then
>>>>> which one I don't care that much.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nicolas
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for Jenkins.  +1 for a redirect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nige
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
>>>>> <niklas@protocol7.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or
Oracle :
>>>>> IMHO
>>>>>>>>> the most active is the Jenkins one)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins
has
>>>>>>>> released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL slaves
not
>>>>>>>> reconnecting correctly. This is a problem we currently have
with
>>>>> our
>>>>>>>> Windows slave and that I would see fixed. So, unless anyone
>>>>> objects, I
>>>>>>>> will look into upgrading to Jenkins 1.396 in the near future.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In my opinion, this has low priority. The major reason for
renaming
>>>>>>>> would probably be to make a stand in the Hudson vs Jenkins
>>>>> situation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> :-) why not a redirect from hudson.a.o to jenkins.a.o ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /niklas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>

Mime
View raw message