www-builds mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sim IJskes - QCG <...@qcg.nl>
Subject Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-QA #66
Date Mon, 22 Nov 2010 07:41:07 GMT
Great!

I've started our freebsd job immediately.

Gr. Sim

On 11/22/2010 01:35 AM, Gav... wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sim IJskes - QCG [mailto:sim@qcg.nl]
>> Sent: Sunday, 21 November 2010 10:11 PM
>> To: builds@apache.org
>> Cc: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Fwd: Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-QA #66
>>
>> Zsolt made the following remarks about our (failing) qa-build on
>> freebsd.
>>
>> Is it possible to get an extra jdk on the freebsd1 instance in the line
>> of the suggestions of Zsolt?
>
> installed in /usr/local/diablo-jdk16/
>
> (though the other is still default)
>
> Most of our jails, including this Hudson one are currently FreeBSD 8.1 64
> bit.
>
> HTH
>
> Gav...
>
>>
>> Gr. Sim
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: Build failed in Hudson: River-trunk-QA #66
>> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 12:55:26 +0100
>> From: Zsolt Kúti<la.tinca@gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> To: river-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> Hello Sim,
>>
>> Nice to hear FreeBSD is among the tested systems!
>>
>> That jdk (1.6.0_03-p4) is rather old an unmaintained. Either
>> diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_11 or current openJdk6 is suggested for use.
>> Further things to consider which FreeBSD version (8.1 is the
>> actual release) and on what platform (32 or 64 bit). I do not know how
>> they are decided on. Could we have some voice in influencing them
>> I would vote for 8.1/32bit (and add 64 bit version if possible).
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Zsolt
>
>


Mime
View raw message