www-builds mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gav..." <ga...@16degrees.com.au>
Subject RE: [hudson] archive phase problems
Date Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:01:16 GMT
Here is another unrelated example I was talking about.


So, more than doubled in the last 3 days compared with other build times.

Note as I mentioned before, this is not tied to just one machine, but
both Ubuntu slaves and the Solaris slave exhibit this behaviour, the
same I stated for the archives builds sebb mentions. 

So, not tied to a particular machine means not disk related. (Surely?)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sim IJskes - QCG [mailto:sim@qcg.nl]
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 November 2010 10:39 PM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Subject: Re: [hudson] archive phase problems
> On 11/23/2010 01:25 PM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
> > Looks like a totally saturated disk subsystem (to me, from a
> distance).
> > Is there sar data from that machine?
> When you have a jobs that prints a timestamp just before the archive
> stage, you can correlate this with the sar data. You just have to look
> at the runq size or the waiting/blocked percentage to see if the I/O
> was
> the culprit. Is there idle=0% or very low, then its CPU bound.
> However, you have to find out how the work is divided between slave and
> master, maybe all the data is first sent to the master, and archived
> there.
> Gr Sim

View raw message