www-builds mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Uh, I guess I wasn't supposed to change the hudson config
Date Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:54:00 GMT
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Niklas Gustavsson <niklas@protocol7.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Are you interested in another Hudson admin? I brought up hudson here
>> at the day job, and have made a few commits to Hudson myself.
> Yes, we're always interested in more Hudson admins. The way it works
> is like for committership, so hang around :-)

This is an aspect of infra that has me a bit confused. I earned my
committer statuses on projects by <del>blackmail</del> posting
patches. At infra, the only patching op I've seen is doc. Should I
look for opportunities to just help on hudson when admin access is not
required? I already help when needed with mahout and cxf.

>> Meanwhile, I'm not sure that lack of 3.0 support explains anything,
>> since using the seemingly supported 3.0 beta I got the same error.
>> For a freestyle stopgap, should I just unpack 3.0 in my personal
>> directory on unbuntu1?
> The best thing is to request an installation as described here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#What_should_I_do_with_the_build_and_test_tools_that_my_project_needs.3F
> In this case, we should set up a general Maven 3.0 installation
> (upgrading the currently provided beta), feel free to open an infra
> ticket so it doesn't fall between the cracks.

Can do.

> /niklas

View raw message