Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 93886 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2010 12:36:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Sep 2010 12:36:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 15303 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2010 12:36:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 15169 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2010 12:36:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact builds-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: builds@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list builds@apache.org Received: (qmail 15161 invoked by uid 99); 24 Sep 2010 12:36:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:36:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tvanlessen@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.50] (HELO mail-fx0-f50.google.com) (209.85.161.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:36:40 +0000 Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so1953486fxm.23 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:36:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8DuGQuPrhh5rGvupn+FR9UNoOMKlCXCqb1JFnKOBwXg=; b=LbJse337ZMN/6gLfFi6HUDGGiTAOyh5RUO66gigabR1m/GiNW8pQXMBPD+X9ilPtFx t9G19ZkvzJBpKQb3s1ICvx0IG9MUuWaFcFhy6vpgknrXhITE0DWsGPjHyd0ME/1qBi5M rV5tJq1iCj3a80rkF+mxSeLeU5TYAg+fpcFP0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dC7jc39PiU9voQxLuM7u9GZDvubHd3LCluHOQt5WWIfxxDucmBBBfUQ7cTJ9uI15fq 2wQCxJ3ANdhLg11lnlusrFRRDZp82DqJ+5P4ODuxB+ltYNdVobYHdBa4QlHwy7QeuUQK nb+6Y5KPd4xb+aMeQFYJzneaqtvqqj1/rPH4s= Received: by 10.223.123.145 with SMTP id p17mr3407994far.90.1285331777731; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.5.101] (e180083205.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.180.83.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t6sm901243faa.27.2010.09.24.05.36.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C9C9B36.6060200@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:36:06 +0200 From: Tammo van Lessen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: builds@apache.org Subject: Re: Builds that have been failing for a while References: <003101cb578c$28b59d60$7a20d820$@com.au> <000001cb5bcd$23fe4200$6bfac600$@com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On 24.09.2010 14:20, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Gav... wrote: >> I would suggest either a combination of both methods - perhaps time of 30 >> days .and. >> the last 5 builds failed, or something like that? > > That was my plan as well. Here's the list of jobs that has failed for > more than one month and with more than 3 unsuccessful builds in a row: > [...] Perhaps it might make sense to also notify the respective PMCs and advertise this mailinglist as I could imagine that some PMCs are not even aware of it. Tammo -- Tammo van Lessen - http://www.taval.de