Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27003 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2010 01:46:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 13 Jul 2010 01:46:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 42197 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2010 01:46:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 42094 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2010 01:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact builds-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: builds@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list builds@apache.org Received: (qmail 42086 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2010 01:46:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 01:46:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of antoine.toulme@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.178] (HELO mail-iw0-f178.google.com) (209.85.214.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 01:45:58 +0000 Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so6650739iwn.23 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:45:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=9Uuujk78pLG2TYBxucwj2b4k4TIDolcjNTHDWWgpKr0=; b=okrqyXn4WL6TP1Fmy0GSiLbx1YNWg0q7SqnzwULY/3FnRUrSxV3czDLcGkh2ZpMFj6 oxBak6EXKlrh4w2jMdnG5b8r35z/blqi4E0PIFuLLMlqrQ+w2CbhyJxMQ9OZd+AeFLRM 5rwSyvlnAbNautJUi9XUbkPoZBvxa5pfP5cc4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=qFZ+ZIF0j0GiA4xkJQipSRVN8KGNDLAUzXGcB7M3Ev4f0w6awE1CRz1UTlrYzAiBkg oi6U9T8JuIxwT+hgpB4Ro4PkX6aGcX9ivXKrWxCwzQhLOYQf3lQrREVbLtBnNHeS99pM wHwFCy6+ndPT5f2bs2/nZuHQuyzcAX4EAOg4w= Received: by 10.231.15.137 with SMTP id k9mr15720307iba.31.1278985537625; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:45:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: antoine.toulme@gmail.com Reply-To: antoine@lunar-ocean.com Received: by 10.231.205.1 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:45:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <008b01cb20fc$54104170$fc30c450$@de> From: Antoine Toulme Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:45:17 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: u7BhKRSrBFqmzAroV-fSf1fm6Zk Message-ID: Subject: Re: Check for timeout plugin To: builds@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022153dd7cfa4a13c048b3b0661 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0022153dd7cfa4a13c048b3b0661 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >From what Kohsuke says on IRC: 1. We cannot make the timeout field mandatory. 2. We can create a plugin that presets the timeout field. 3. We can iterate over the projects like Jan did and set a value for the timeouts en masse. On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 18:27, Antoine Toulme wrot= e: > +1 > > Is there a way to enforce setting a timeout ? I'll ask #hudson. > > Thanks, > > Antoine > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 13:19, Niklas Gustavsson wr= ote: > >> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Jan Mat=E8rne wrote: >> > Should every job have a timeout? >> >> I think they should. >> >> /niklas >> > > --0022153dd7cfa4a13c048b3b0661--