Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 82054 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2010 17:00:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2010 17:00:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 42638 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 17:00:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 42572 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2010 17:00:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact builds-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: builds@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list builds@apache.org Received: (qmail 42562 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2010 17:00:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:00:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.211 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.211] (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (209.85.218.211) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:00:22 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so240092bwz.9 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:00:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=XRGvC+Y+DFD1Njq+RRH5o/d3wzZ80BgIoL3hwnHGlRc=; b=iCJtFzbed9F87hvRSXdOiR6a2BEj0NHFDTn7o4t0c5u3fi4ZakPICFJO0thB1IifM6 AhaNaTp5WhEeRzak2hcjxgNOEs3rx5hUZCbM+3yxDo1eD6wWeEQQ+B2QMPogSdu3v6gF EMYo92/csGzITKi0li7qO5MOIW7DqJNksD8go= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=FBL8Dr56tTEB6669y36E6dh8d7TibxRdiIKA9j3OwrLMbjdjlaiqSfFPGtpg6pw7JF pg+Zf8JD8xmNy9VLfMEsV85KmqQL+WKOA0N/5t3RjDupB6IiXpjpUv4yj59byfCQuANS iArW5G0m887V57sE0beQcoVfZ2K2BGY+W1zs4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.16.88 with SMTP id n24mr873611bka.89.1266598800838; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:00:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6c399e451002190837u4e32087udddb5a7125a3f721@mail.gmail.com> References: <6c399e451002190500p56920cd8nf8471fcaf48b6c12@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac1002190642q57adb7adv57e65f2503a0a3ca@mail.gmail.com> <6c399e451002190837u4e32087udddb5a7125a3f721@mail.gmail.com> From: Jukka Zitting Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:59:36 +0100 Message-ID: <510143ac1002190859m250522d5va6cbb522ed26c4f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hudson restarted To: builds@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Justin Mason wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 14:42, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> That's 30mins. Not sure what we can do to speed that up. > > Perhaps we should consider archiving old builds at this stage -- we > have lots, alright. Agreed. I wouldn't be surprised if the large amount of old builds was also a contributing factor to the OOM issue we saw earlier today. How about limiting build jobs to keeping just the ten latest builds by default plus any builds that have explicitly been tagged? BR, Jukka Zitting