www-builds mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Use of Lucene Zones
Date Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:21:53 GMT

On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Kristian Waagan wrote:

> Den 23.02.2010 18:50, skrev Grant Ingersoll:
>> I'm a bit confused why Derby is using the Lucene Zone to begin with.  Doesn't Derby
have it's own Zone?  I don't necessarily have a problem with it, but it would be nice if the
Lucene PMC was asked before our resources are utilized.  I'm sure it was just assumed b/c
the Lucene Zone shows up in Hudson, but my understanding from earlier discussions was that
it was done out of convenience for Lucene (b/c that's where Hudson was first installed anyway)
and that other Zones would be setup if projects wanted to provide their own resources to Hudson
and that other build machines were provisioned to support the majority of projects
>> 
>> Anyone else have any insight?
> 
> Hi Grant,
> 
> Not really, but I have moved the Derby jobs off the Lucene zone (see comment on INFRA-2502).
I got into the Hudson-game a bit late, so I must have missed the discussions you refer to
(and I haven't read the archives).
> 
> A while back I asked on the builds-list (see "Hudson Derby jobs", 2009-11-24) if the
zones machine could handle another zone running Hudson jobs, but I don't think I got any feedback.
Derby isn't using its zone for anything, so I can ask the PMC again if we can donate the zone
to Hudson. Before doing that I'd like to get a +1 from infra regarding the hardware utilization
situation.
> 
> Sorry for doing something I wasn't supposed to do, hope it didn't cause too much trouble.

No, definitely not a big deal.  Bringing it up more for your sanity than anything else, as
the Lucene PMC, of course, reserves the right to change our Zone (not that we have) so that
something you relied on may not be there in the future.

-Grant
Mime
View raw message