Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 94563 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2009 17:09:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2009 17:09:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 75425 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 17:09:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-builds-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 75373 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2009 17:09:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact builds-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: builds@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list builds@apache.org Received: (qmail 75363 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2009 17:09:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:09:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.207.172.168] (HELO server.dankulp.com) (66.207.172.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:09:05 +0000 Received: by server.dankulp.com (Postfix, from userid 5000) id 40EF0507001D; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:08:44 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1-gr1 (2007-05-02) on server.dankulp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Msg-File: /tmp/mailfilter.OfD7OmAnbR Received: from dilbert.localnet (c-24-91-141-225.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.91.141.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.dankulp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 664CF5070016; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:08:43 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Kulp To: builds@apache.org Subject: Re: Hudson machine utilization Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:08:33 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.3 (Linux/2.6.32-rc6; KDE/4.3.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Nigel Daley References: <4AE859A1.3070808@gmail.com> <4B0127F3.30507@apache.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911161208.33430.dkulp@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.1-gr1 On Mon November 16 2009 11:23:42 am Nigel Daley wrote: > I think anything currently *unbound* gets run on the master since it's > the only 'slave' that isn't reserved for tied jobs (last I looked). So would it make sense to "untick" that tick box for vesta and/or minerva? -- Daniel Kulp dkulp@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog