www-builds mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Mason ...@jmason.org>
Subject Re: Hudson machine utilization
Date Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:13:38 GMT
Well, we could move more load from hudson.zones to minerva first:

http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/computer/%28master%29/load-statistics
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/computer/minerva.apache.org%20%28Ubuntu%29/load-statistics

(wow, those are good graphs!)

We certainly should embark on a program of persuading projects to
schedule their jobs on both Linux and Solaris, though, to do that....

--j.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 14:48, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just looking at the Hudson machine utilization at the moment.  There are
> a number of jobs that are tied to particular machines in the queue, and
> a number of (hadoop-labeled) machines that are committed to tied jobs only.
>
> I realize that the machines are courteously donated etc, but is the
> capacity being used effectively [1]?
>
> In particular, would the Hadoop jobs be impacted if we reclassified an
> existing slave as general usage, and more jobs as scheduable anywhere?
>
> [1] e.g.
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/computer/hadoop1%20%28Ubuntu%29/load-statistics?type=hour
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>



-- 
--j.

Mime
View raw message