Mailing-List: contact builds-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: builds@apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
From: Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
To: infrastructure@apache.org
Subject: Re: Welcome to the builds list!
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:25:05 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.29-gentoo; KDE/4.2.2; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Nigel Daley <ndaley@yahoo-inc.com>,
 Gavin <gavin@16degrees.com.au>,
 builds@apache.org
References: <F6DE053BADF54E1985BF595A4CF0734D@developer>
 <3DCF593C3A3347349B179A49BBBD1ACD@developer>
 <1C3B0CD2-1F7E-44E2-82F4-1C6BC81A92CA@yahoo-inc.com>
In-Reply-To: <1C3B0CD2-1F7E-44E2-82F4-1C6BC81A92CA@yahoo-inc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200904230925.05516.dkulp@apache.org>


Is there any particular reason that the index page at ci.apache.org be updated 
to add sections for Hudson and Continuum?   Would that solve everyones issues?

Or maybe push buildbot stuff into ci.apache.org/buildbot, have 
ci.apache.org/hudson and continuum.   There "index" at ci.apache.org would 
still mention and point to buildbot stuff, so existing blogs and stuff would 
still be "accurate". 

I'm failing to see what all the hub-bub is about.

Dan


On Thu April 23 2009 1:22:49 am Nigel Daley wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Gavin wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: bdelacretaz@gmail.com [mailto:bdelacretaz@gmail.com] On
> >> Behalf Of
> >> Bertrand Delacretaz
> >> Sent: Wednesday, 15 April 2009 6:28 PM
> >> To: builds@apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Welcome to the builds list!
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Gavin <gavin@16degrees.com.au>
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:ndaley@yahoo-inc.com]
> >>>> .... Also, Gavin can we have ci.apache.org go to a page that
> >>>> points to
> >>
> >> the
> >>
> >>>> 3 CI choices that Apache projects have: Buildbot, Continuum, and
> >>
> >> Hudson?
> >>
> >>> Absolutely, ci.apache.org was created a couple of months back whilst
> >>
> >> testing
> >>
> >>> buildbot and before this amalgamation of CIs list was thought
> >>> about. It
> >>> makes sense so I will do that soon, thanks for the suggestion....
> >>
> >> It might be good to mention this list there as well.
> >> -Bertrand
> >
> > Yep good plan.
> >
> > A slight change to name to use as the main builds area to go to,
> > ci.apache.org has been advertised/blogged/tweeted/whatever as
> > belonging to
> > the buildbot setup. I think it is too late now to move that to another
> > domain. Either way, a new name was needed for either buildbot usage
> > or the
> > main builds area (landing page?).
> >
> > So, to keep inline with this list name etc, and Wendy proposed on
> > IRC that
> > builds.apache.org would be a better fit for the new area.
> >
> > If there are no objections I'd like to ask infra if they could set
> > that up
> > for us? (cc:d)
> >
> > Gav...
>
> Hmm, not crazy about this, but ok.  Not sure why you didn't go with
> buildbot.apache.org.  Taking ci.apache.org seems a little over reaching.
>
> Nige

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog