Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302F8200B91 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:57:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 2EEE0160AE3; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 67CC7160AD7 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:57:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 67767 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2016 08:57:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apachecon-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list apachecon-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 67752 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2016 08:57:57 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:57:57 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.36] (dk.quenda.co [90.184.204.23]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id F22C21A0118 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Some feedback on the new review mechanism To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org References: <1ca0444e-279b-81bd-538e-20b47f34fa55@apache.org> From: Daniel Gruno Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:57:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit archived-at: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:57:59 -0000 On 09/29/2016 10:25 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Le 29/09/16 à 09:55, Daniel Gruno a écrit : >> I'll see if I can answer some of the critique here. >> And I'll also note that critique - whether it be positive or negative - >> is most welcome. > > I just want to know if there is a way to get the score for accepted talks ? > > Thanks ! > I don't believe we'll be sharing the data. Maybe in an anonymized fashion, but certainly not the raw data. Rich may shed more light on this :) With regards, Daniel.