www-apachecon-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jan i <j...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Suggested review timeline for apacheCON CORE.
Date Mon, 06 Jul 2015 05:38:22 GMT
On Monday, July 6, 2015, Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:

> Oh .. I didn't think of that. I was just thinking of a logical sequence in
> which the topics build up on each other, but I do understand that two talks
> in sequence could be a problem ... then I think this order could be similar:
>
> - (Justin) Introduction to Apache Flex
> - (Chris) An introduction to Apache Flex BlazeDS
> - (Justin) Unit testing Apache Flex Applications
> - (Om) Build mobile apps using Apache Flex (yes, including iOS!)
> - (Chris) Building FlexJS applications with Maven
> - (Om) Building HTML5/JS apps using FlexJS


thanks I will rearrange the track to this sequence.

>
> I think this would still build up on each other: After an introduction to
> the "client-side" there's a small detour to the server-side (blazeds) ...
> after that in general how to unit-test your application, then Om would go
> deeper into writing a special, but very important type of client ... mobile
> client. After that I could explain how you use all the stuff learned by
> Maven hereby sattisfying all the "But how do you do that on a CI server"
> guys. As a finale Om would talk about what will probably be the future of
> Flex with our super-cool FlexJS.
>
> Think this wouldn't confuse users, it's still a logical chain and no two
> talks of the same speaker in sequence.


Siunds correct to me too.

rgds
jan i

>
> Chris
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: jan i <jani@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> Gesendet: Montag, 6. Juli 2015 00:58
> An: apachecon-discuss@apache.org <javascript:;>
> Betreff: Re: Suggested review timeline for apacheCON CORE.
>
> On 5 July 2015 at 14:45, Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Öhm ... I thouht we have to look at what tracks survive LFs selection and
> > if we can make a track out of that ...
> >
> > Well in this case I would like to propose the Flex Track and I would also
> > propose this order (@Justin: please correct me if you see it differently
> > ... it's 39°C here and I desperately need to get to the pool ;-) ):
> >
> > - Introduction to Apache Flex
> > - Unit testing Apache Flex Applications
> > - Build mobile apps using Apache Flex (yes, including iOS!)
> > - Building HTML5/JS apps using FlexJS
> > - Building FlexJS applications with Maven
> > - An introduction to Apache Flex BlazeDS
> >
> while scheduling, I saw that there are only 3 speakers, and you have
> ordered the presentations so that
> each speaker will give 2 presentations back to back.
>
> I do not recommend keeping the same speaker for 2 presentations back to
> back. But if the projects prefers
> I will let the schedule stay.
>
> rgds
> jan i.
>
>
> >
> > Runner-Up Talk (If we need some gap filling):
> > Flex Automation - Making automated front-end testing easy
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > Von: jan i <jani@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Juli 2015 14:30
> > An: jan i
> > Cc: apachecon-discuss@apache.org <javascript:;>; Sharan Foga; Pierre
> Smits; Christofer
> > Dutz; Leif Hedstrom; Justin Mclean; Roman Shaposhnik; Neha Narkhede;
> Kostas
> > Tzoumas; Nick Dimiduk; Shawn McKinney; OmPrakash Muppirala
> > Betreff: Re: Suggested review timeline for apacheCON CORE.
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> >
> > Just a polite reminder, it is sunday, and I have not received a single
> > track ?
> >
> > We need to move quickly, to that presenters who are rejected have a
> chance
> > of applying to big data.
> >
> > rgds
> > jan i.
> >
> >
> > On 30 June 2015 at 11:20, jan i <jani@apache.org <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > In just a few hours the CFP for apacheCON CORE will officially close,
> > then
> > > the second batch
> > > of hard work starts. We need to review the talks and put them in a
> > > schedule.
> > >
> > > Our timeline is a little bit critical, because some presentations are
> > > submitted for both events, and
> > > if rejected in core the should have a chance in big data, and opposite
> if
> > > accepted they should be
> > > rejected in big data.
> > >
> > > Wednesday July 1, CFP closes officially, and reviews can start.
> > > Thursday July 2, I will write to all who have submitted tutorials etc.
> > > Friday July 3, CFP will be really closed and final csv pulled of the
> > > database
> > > Sunday July 5, Review from track builders (as well as order of tracks)
> > > should be completed
> > >                         (please mail me directly the order of the
> tracks
> > > with the titles)
> > > Wednesday July 8, first version of schedule should be ready to be
> > > discussed with LF
> > > Friday July 10, CFP big data closes,
> > > Sunday July 12, accept/reject letters to be mailed.
> > >
> > > I hope most of you who have build tracks, already know the talks, so
> > > reviewing will be an easy
> > > and fast task.
> > >
> > > Help with reviewing all the other talks is HIGHLY appreciated.
> > >
> > > I am full time working on apacheCON the next week, so do not hesitate
> to
> > > mail me if case of
> > > comments or questions.
> > >
> > > I will also try to be on IRC as much as possible (#apachecon).
> > >
> > > on behalf of the apacheCON team
> > > jan i.
> > >
> >



-- 
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message