www-apachecon-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
Subject Re: Talks review
Date Tue, 30 Jun 2015 06:49:20 GMT
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:12 PM, jan i <jani@apache.org> wrote:
> On 30 June 2015 at 01:38, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:07 AM, jan i <jani@apache.org> wrote:
>> > I will look at both CFPs to check for duplicates as well as wrongly
>> placed
>> > presentations.
>> By now -- I've seen quite a few identical talks submitted to both. It
>> doesn't
>> bother me for bucketing purposes, but it can become a problem for talk
>> placement between different reviewers.
> It should not be for 2 reasons.
> - E.g. You are reviewing both events.

yeah, but I'm somewhat unique in that set of reviewers. I don't think
others who review big data also review core, that said...

> - we schedule CORE before big data closes, so it the talk is not used in
> CORE it participates in "big data".
>    (talks that we have used in CORE, should be marked with a "strong
> reject" and reason in big data, I will control that)

...because of the above it may not be a problem after all.


View raw message