Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FBF7D96F for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67037 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2012 09:52:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 66899 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2012 09:52:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apachecon-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list apachecon-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 66867 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2012 09:52:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:52:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rgardler@opendirective.com designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.182] (HELO mail-wi0-f182.google.com) (209.85.212.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:52:36 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hm2so2524221wib.5 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 02:52:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=opendirective.com; s=opendirective; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cgxFyYsM98YipmtdByNkf0Zza1uNWNIYVg1Kf1fNkM0=; b=CEVsLmlKF/lbI99ad7ZEMLcc3osDF2QWPoPLKAijTfZ1ZVW8U/MolCGzoSg2Et7mUc 5NBp7WZpZcs4DTOsKXSxOx5eOZOv9gcBBVvZNpPo7QObrVWRuJxwnE6tCDB8FDu5LDsw vhuSC1jmfWvhW66HckBiSAGhfER/buwt0KJV4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=cgxFyYsM98YipmtdByNkf0Zza1uNWNIYVg1Kf1fNkM0=; b=oUCrJXXTqKtZxzkzQ6CEmtBuDm0ldj5gzRUqGxycWo0Jmu2hf42J5Xhtw3HrjRbrwQ KSr4YtFB1y9UNJhJDUaSzRK6WQJ1+0xnismofWHonXxZhk+y1onCWeY283+OqviLoEFg kzwBqJF6pJ7FOJKzYUVff+YkLfzIwqkDlvCiQqPcYSjMTreEa8HsSrlwMkM2AcbhgbVX 9/O0HyE2dtarbg4N1G2ub1XxtSyclCTBOUW66LbQBJjOnOaKAhB0u2t0yjzXgc6LKroz rEw61Xzi9CY+CdHvUp3XEPge4WyfIJJsT3jVK/MoqcJxOBCrQMHewGeZHv8GTsvN936d E3uw== Received: by 10.180.80.100 with SMTP id q4mr27694177wix.20.1350985935698; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 02:52:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.134.104 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 02:51:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [81.156.151.252] In-Reply-To: References: <508641E9.20405@apache.org> <9FC209D2-6401-4FF1-A676-B0361E30E37F@holdenweb.com> From: Ross Gardler Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:51:35 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Teleconferencing options for speakers who cannot attend To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk8iaAZPA+KBJ7HDW2lNXCCfNPxzWpRkYjXcoM4yTNZ804yDYnXB7lNaCEZUQcTIbt+9nHE X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 23 October 2012 10:40, dsh wrote: > Just an idea - how about if somebody from the German AOO team would be > co-presenting and does the driver of the presentation? Is that > feasible or wouldn't there be any reason in such a model? I fully agree with Christian's concerns and think your proposal is a "best of both worlds" solution. Ross > > Cheers > Daniel > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: >> Honestly (and sorry to say), if I attend a conference and pay the full >> price, I would be more than disappointed if the presenter is not in >> the same room as me. I can watch youtube videos without wasting my >> money. I am not the conference expert, but I doubt there are (many) >> other conferences using remote presentations. >> >> Cheers >> Christian >> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Steve Holden wrot= e: >>> Andrea: >>> >>> Apparently we don't have any guarantees on quality of service, so we ar= e suggesting that speakers who wish to try this route should prepare a vide= o for use if the remote presentation doesn't work out. >>> >>> I presume that no special room set-up will be needed for these talks ex= cept audio connection to the computer that's used to display the call? >>> >>> regards >>> Steve >>> >>> On Oct 23, 2012, at 8:06 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> >>>> As discussed on the ooo-dev list http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_m= box/incubator-ooo-dev/ we have several speakers from China (all in the Open= Office track, it seems) who are facing delays in getting a visa to Germany = for ApacheCon. >>>> >>>> A suggestion from Louis Su=E1rez-Potts is to allow teleconferencing: s= peakers who cannot be physically in Germany would still be able to give the= ir presentation as an online seminar. >>>> >>>> Would this be possible with the current infrastructure in Sinsheim? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Andrea. >>> >>> -- >>> Steve Holden steve@holdenweb.com, Holden Web, LLC http://holdenweb.com= / >>> Python classes (and much more) through the web http://oreillyschool.com= / >>> Conferences and technical event management at http://theopenbastion.com= / >>> Next: Helping with ApacheCon EU (community edition) http://apachecon.eu= / >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> https://www.timeandbill.de --=20 Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com