Return-Path: 
 <apachecon-discuss-return-797-apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive=apache.org@apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DA19D39B
	for <apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Tue,  2 Oct 2012 16:44:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 80387 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2012 16:44:42 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 80312 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2012 16:44:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact apachecon-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:apachecon-discuss-help@apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:apachecon-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:apachecon-discuss@apache.org>
List-Id: <apachecon-discuss.apache.org>
Reply-To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list apachecon-discuss@apache.org
Received: (qmail 80304 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2012 16:44:42 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:44:42 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [91.198.169.22] (HELO csmtp2.one.com) (91.198.169.22)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:44:36 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.36] (3304ds3-soeb.0.fullrate.dk [90.184.126.17])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by csmtp2.one.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AC15301821E
	for <apachecon-discuss@apache.org>; Tue,  2 Oct 2012 16:44:14 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <506B19DE.2010808@cord.dk>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:44:14 +0200
From: Daniel Gruno <rumble@cord.dk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org
Subject: Re: SVG Source of the Banners
References: <506745AE.4080600@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
 <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210010041540.7309@urchin.earth.li>
 <CDE29DB4-8C9A-4836-8EB4-4CB36BF7C4CC@holdenweb.com>
 <5069B219.3010304@mail.imacat.idv.tw> <5069D2F6.2010506@cord.dk>
 <506AB40C.60409@cord.dk> <506AE5AA.5090708@mail.imacat.idv.tw>
 <506AEA23.7010806@cord.dk>
 <CADHP4mwbUQdiYkuBi0XAemYxwWWCzd_jz9GJC3YLd_kCmTC6cA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADHP4mwbUQdiYkuBi0XAemYxwWWCzd_jz9GJC3YLd_kCmTC6cA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 10/02/2012 06:30 PM, Albino B Neto wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Daniel Gruno <rumble@cord.dk> wrote:
>> Square banner: http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apachecon_square.svg
>> Wide banner: http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apachecon_wide.svg
> 
> Very good.
> 
> I can use the banner on my blog and website?
> 
> Albino
> 
ahem,
<formality>
I hereby grant the ASF ownership of the SVG versions of the logos.
</formality>

So yes, you may use them for your blog and web site. The original images
are already on the apachecon web site, so I don't see any reason why you
shouldn't be allowed to use the svg version if that's what you want -
surely we can always use some more publicity :)

With regards,
Daniel