From apachecon-discuss-return-592-apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive=apache.org@apache.org Mon Aug 13 08:49:59 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A655994A for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92892 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2012 08:49:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 92521 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2012 08:49:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apachecon-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list apachecon-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 92493 invoked by uid 99); 13 Aug 2012 08:49:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:49:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pierre.smits@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.178] (HELO mail-ob0-f178.google.com) (209.85.214.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:49:48 +0000 Received: by obbwd20 with SMTP id wd20so8835119obb.23 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:49:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RNmaVAPCcRJLOzxYulzAK+hABXGIBujUKkhnvh3fmQA=; b=MSzYfT/sF6v/QSHeGhNEGgEP4/FG6/dftYABjIVb7+7jUVBYfdBIeGdYql8q9YmD0g ZjN3+XTG4wnn6m78XF1+6VN6nArl8klDcP/7+cOwthtzUAJJTs4Gp/TnQF5ajstrymHs JznTiSW4O+u53RDs0Fi8no9L3aCD1YmnYG+wM4+8PCbNMbstilc6YIy7vMIcFM3H6qOt mKFIzfosOxJVeiVmGkL06TQ+6iRa/niNFsBHMGqG6oKTBoeqMPpYKrBdUWMrJ0TOGdEy AP8SV0NCHYravLQhIBCa9qcTAHKJUfTpDUo4HzyShXLPzzN5Yg2axUzufoYotpotalnN CmPA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.2.42 with SMTP id 10mr11433849oer.9.1344847768330; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.11.133 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:49:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1344847003.333.YahooMailNeo@web28901.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> References: <2311FBF3-2839-421F-A1B7-DCB1C2A7582C@holdenweb.com> <1344847003.333.YahooMailNeo@web28901.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:49:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ApacheCon Europe CFP closes Monday! From: Pierre Smits To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org, Mark Struberg Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb205fe82212a04c721c529 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8fb205fe82212a04c721c529 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Mark, Reviewers don't see their own submissions. This has been pointend out somewhere else on this mailing list. Regards, Pierre On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hmm, I know from people which told me that they've submitted a talk and I > don't find them on the review page. > Should all talks which get entered automatically pop up on the list or do > reviewers only get some randomly assigned to review? > > From a track chair perspective, I'd like to see all (at least from the > talks submitted to my track 'ApachEE') and check if they fit well. For > having a good track there should be a consistent red line behind it. > Otherwise we don't need tracks at all ;) > Or we might find some tracks we would like to shift around a bit. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Steve Holden > > To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 1:43 AM > > Subject: Re: ApacheCon Europe CFP closes Monday! > > > > I think it's time based, but let me check with Eldarion. > > > > S > > > > On Aug 11, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Nick Burch wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 11 Aug 2012, Donald Harbison wrote: > >>> For those of us who like to test our adrenal glands....what is the UTC > > time on Monday for CFP system lock? > >> > >> Hmm, I'm not sure. If you're lucky, it might just be Tuesday UTC... > > But best not to cut it that fine! > >> > >> Steve - am I right in thinking that to turn off the CFP, we need to go > into > > the admin, and under Home -> Proposals -> Proposal sections -> Talks > > change "Closed" from Unknown to True? Or is it something that Eldarion > > have to do? > >> > >> If it's the former, I suspect the CFP will close late Monday evening > > Steve's time (Pacific). If the latter, then it depends on when Eldarion > are > > able to pull the plug late on Monday... > >> > >> Thanks > >> Nick > > > > -- > > Steve Holden steve@holdenweb.com, Holden Web, LLC http://holdenweb.com/ > > Python classes (and much more) through the web http://oreillyschool.com/ > > Conferences and technical event management at http://theopenbastion.com/ > > Next: DjangoCon US Sep 6-8, Washington DC http://djangocon.us/ > > > -- Pierre Smits ApacheCon EU 2012 - Sinsheim, Germany Apache OFBiz --e89a8fb205fe82212a04c721c529--