Mailing-List: contact apachecon-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of justinmclean@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.50 as permitted sender)
Sender: Justin Mclean <justinmclean@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1280)
Subject: Re: Apache Flex
From: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOvkMobLCVJvLeSd6uw0VNMucRe-U60qvT18vX4v3+rsbX=j0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:32:07 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F6A94131-C778-4184-80B8-43F087438F37@classsoftware.com>
References: <0519CE75-BA36-4F71-B59F-1947D2626572@classsoftware.com>
 <CAPoyBqRNOWUYLUOHfsxbQWRezJmiRWx01Zmh1Kk8uPPACGjEPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOvkMobLCVJvLeSd6uw0VNMucRe-U60qvT18vX4v3+rsbX=j0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org

Hi,

> But I don't think it would be Fair for Flex to be there, I believe it
> should be in [1]. Justin what do you think ?


It doesn't really fit into Apache Daily track as it is not a tool but a =
client side programming framework.

Flex is more a enterprise product so there's some fit and while it's =
written Java and does have some following in the Java community. Most =
talks about Flex would not mention Java at all and as a client side =
framework I'm not sure it fits into the JavaEE track but it doesn't seem =
to fit in any of the other tracks.

Thanks,
Justin=