Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D291EDB7D for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70200 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2012 12:33:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 69998 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2012 12:33:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apachecon-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list apachecon-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 69985 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2012 12:33:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:33:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.178] (HELO mail-gh0-f178.google.com) (209.85.160.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:33:06 +0000 Received: by ghbf1 with SMTP id f1so13363165ghb.23 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:32:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=TAUxXH7FAU4XVHorZL/oM1IheeKKdLH9968Dnthbks0=; b=FkD/sYwXc1zBY4RGtovYsfbus1bULWgQLDsYUIOQT7Y3Vslnj1gLO7Yy4Czwuxy7qh wmuH63TpxvGUOP45jezSAI2pZtiXgJoKLbgUkHgEFqvlbKDr6XlIssTmllHZU/ID9fkM pgBakYhvJ39QrOP8wuCZCIP7UZqbp+5B2z1D1GKkrkHSzkJJjQ5TWdsztcx5nflN1y1i M6PB3K+V0otnTCYITEfop+9XH5DBp4LXcqMAjUKJzZOtcd5V0c3duGCjf1Muc2ACqbYB aFAWPRjqR2NRjVC5IfmaBlCJDEIG4fKR67+YHvs2QcXXGa8AvsbOjT0kPMeT49ZOXGW8 j9SA== Received: by 10.66.75.168 with SMTP id d8mr73083194paw.63.1341923565446; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:32:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.122.1 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:32:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: David Nalley Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:32:25 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ACEU Venue Visit - Thursday 26th July To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkyvPyoI9CsB7m8zdB9iKQxs2+ruAnptALurccEj1RlZG7B0MBv96QoUO7DCeQEcHZazEgG X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > - Internet capacity (actual not claimed - my experience is they are > often wildly different - especially when hit with 300 bandwidth hungry > hackers) Lots of detail here: How much bandwidth, how many Access Points, etc. Basically we need to know can and if we need to supplement the number of APs. > - power provision Esp if the venue has a plethora of extension cords and powerstrips, or whether we need to acquire some. Most venues aren't used to geek crowds, and don't understand 1-2 powerstrips per table. Policies on outside food vendors. Where do we go when the main venue kicks us out for the night? --David