From apachecon-discuss-return-348-apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive=apache.org@apache.org Mon Jul 23 11:56:22 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDADC9757 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11192 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2012 11:56:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 10993 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2012 11:56:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apachecon-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list apachecon-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 10969 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2012 11:56:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:56:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of stan.ieugen@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.50] (HELO mail-vb0-f50.google.com) (209.85.212.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:56:15 +0000 Received: by vbal1 with SMTP id l1so5691126vba.23 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 04:55:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=kpMCgiOlDHlkMelqDbamBmt2dlqQ+bfrv/AdiTsRd+k=; b=zeYn7YQt6O0WQNW+q+ClJRgYa0fWbejBmwEM36p2bZ8rGJa5wf5HauALXAKSMDiIxl jf10+hVkP765gQf8P/j+Y4vbo3QppRgsQXL6U+/wT8MMM67+QbWvFGKuybirW/+Pt7GW yAeb0tMbYjOFYyU74MmDoGxH3Wd7oNNY8zuwNeiZk5AxtJqtdAqMEWDUUABmLytCZ2HW RQHJbe+YLp2gMZ4yVMggdVgr4tgvWRHd/xXmDXiyChbF8J6ql+4KAlOJxzMdL0dlEw5H YrLDAAtJSYvS4ewiStEahbbIEVTfEQk15ytyLSQUAZYx9EIB30602KPL3RJVq0fX8gko xtxg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.149.79 with SMTP id s15mr12015484vcv.71.1343044554555; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 04:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.155.70 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 04:55:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1343040204.31197.YahooMailNeo@web28905.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> References: <66BD268F973E3544A665E5F503FB38B71B462FE7A0@DC01.bmw-carit.intra> <1343040204.31197.YahooMailNeo@web28905.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:55:54 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apachecon EU 2012 - Which Track for a middleware as Apache Etch? From: Ioan Eugen Stan To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org, Mark Struberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I'm also having difficulties getting James in any of the tracks listed. Could fit to Apache EE or Web Infrastructure or maybe even OFBiz. But doesn't identify itself with any of them. I'll submit a talk about using James as a gateway for email-to-any (twitter, XMMP, etc. ). Any suggestions are welcomed. Cheers, 2012/7/23 Mark Struberg : > Hi! > > Don't think that ApachEE fits good for Etch. ApachEE is focusing purely on our Java EE core technologies stack. > Same for Syncope, though it's much closer. Would be nice to explain the overlaps/difference between Syncope and Shiro btw ;) > > > Maybe we could have a 2nd track which supplements the ApachEE core track and showcases the different "Enterprise Integration" scenarios. > Maybe that would also fit to Camel and it's parts? > > In general: we have quite a few projects which sound like the same on the first glance, but are heavily different at the end: > Syncope/Shiro > Jackrabbit/Sling > Accumulo/Cassandra > ... > > Would be interesting to better explain the differences? Not sure if this is an easy to cover conference topic though, but I got lots of questions regarding the focus of a few projects. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Mohammad Nour El-Din >> To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org >> Cc: >> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 11:28 AM >> Subject: Re: Apachecon EU 2012 - Which Track for a middleware as Apache Etch? >> >> Hi Martin >> >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Martin Veith >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> the Apache Etch (incubating) team would like to give a talk about the >>> project at ApacheCon EU 2012. As we are currenlty preparing our proposal we >>> are asking ourself which track fits the best. >>> >>> Etch is a middleware framework to build and consum network services. (for >>> more details: http://incubator.apache.org/etch) >>> In my opinion, a middleware is not a classical Web Infrastructure or Cloud >>> topic. Maybe Apache Daily? What do you think? >>> >> >> What about http://www.apachecon.eu/tracks/#apache-ee >> >> IMO this fits in the enterprise applications related category more >> specifically integration and services oriented software development >> >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Martin >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks >> - Mohammad Nour >> ---- >> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep >> moving" >> - Albert Einstein >> -- Ioan Eugen Stan / CTO / http://axemblr.com