From apachecon-discuss-return-283-apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive=apache.org@apache.org Tue Jul 17 11:59:28 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3909ADB7C for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55569 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2012 11:59:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 55411 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2012 11:59:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apachecon-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list apachecon-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 55389 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2012 11:59:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:59:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of daniel.haischt@googlemail.com designates 209.85.161.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.178] (HELO mail-gg0-f178.google.com) (209.85.161.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:59:22 +0000 Received: by ggcq6 with SMTP id q6so339601ggc.23 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 04:59:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=AuQU49T6YxMk4eWg4aCtVqoSP6P6fiefSN2ITH+42iw=; b=Jyky9CWynBMZHU7jUZiP2Cet1qGNCvb5zigK3VigJj+8cOxhbV7Bfz4EbO/RqBR3ym LtiJL+ACyHLikYIv86ZEr/Z0ZB2VaR14z0jK30TahJSzurXbjX6+UvQ0usT3Cjtdjl+4 B2HILyfHJMMHlIuWzm4pPmmtmcVHEfesx9tq4lLxsQ5A5kMs9Bp7IZg78uNxyOkauwcI v9Q82Ijqqr769w47XPQMwGXnXq3DCC6F9q+uGJ6CuxDtpr3bED252FPRS9Fde7oX+Gy+ W+G6JEyt6bijmBflCom68nYqYMkDNt0DPTg8+LkjDgPkXQfFetv6nVtusoxgGHEoJGR6 5JRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.160.198 with SMTP id xm6mr1069924igb.0.1342526341123; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 04:59:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.126.135 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 04:59:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1342525830.23226.YahooMailNeo@web171505.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> References: <1342525830.23226.YahooMailNeo@web171505.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:59:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Anyone at OSCON able to make some announcement signs? From: dsh To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org, Mark Struberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I would remove the cast shadow of the vertical bar in #8. IMO it kinda contradicts the cleanness of the right half of the logo... Cheers Daniel On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > +1 for logo no 8. > > > 9 is not bad neither, but 8 is an eye catcher. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Nick Burch >> To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org >> Cc: >> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 1:42 PM >> Subject: Anyone at OSCON able to make some announcement signs? >> >> Hi All >> >> I believe a few people from this list are at OSCON this week? >> >> Would one (or two!) of you be able to work to get some signs about the >> conference dates, to go up in the Apache booth? Ideally today, if not tomorrow. >> If possible, we want to list the dates and venues for both ACEU and ACNA, and >> the fact that the ACEU CFP is open. >> >> Daniel has done some great work on logos, which we ought to be able to use for >> this, eg http://people.apache.org/~druggeri/AC2012/#9 >> >> Melissa may be able to help a bit (not sure, you'd need to find and ask >> her!), and I'm told there's a print shop not far away. >> >> Anyone at OSCON able to help? :) >> >> Cheers >> Nick >> (Stuck in England so not able to help...) >>