Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D066D0EE for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 159 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2012 15:07:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 99959 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2012 15:07:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apachecon-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list apachecon-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 99949 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2012 15:07:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:07:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.86.168.182] (HELO mxout-07.mxes.net) (216.86.168.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:07:38 +0000 Received: from mail-yx0-f178.google.com (unknown [209.85.213.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1059822E1F4 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:07:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by yenl6 with SMTP id l6so1201593yen.23 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:07:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=mDJaglSSXXVSlDF+68+wLRB7tq/8o+ofNyCva1NsaH8=; b=HPwemX53KVAL3aINF7/f+8NQFPJ/mzGky+Q8vv54Ho8Ykuy5SdPDkAMnvEDNy4yFlA UdA4yeXbmxPKsoMjq/vUOghsx/rDiiWvTCxio+onCwHLldEkqhOJXlkz2pGdAhovvQHO Tz9SDbGaLMuFrvHMmZEPhVIkOQZ2EGcTngpfnuA2+XrbuVCnclUqgUbTC0aA8ZhcnmHY JxDff0dOVw2umEMzj87Lhpz6MgENxXBdCKZgsozSm1VeON32eT6lTzA6R2lyt7s1ul+W rrlkNa9XQX4962IMxbDi7BnjeVlwlhEVpuJHlGYz6YHMCsvwLZbndvLKPmBzKVpR/UkY yW1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.190.163 with SMTP id gr3mr1983082igc.74.1340809637342; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.170.71 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:07:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [91.137.97.21] Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:07:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Linked Data Track From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Reto_Bachmann=2DGm=FCr?= To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04478817252c4204c3759274 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnXii5d+Bas0utiH6ZNfHiyyEAsojtP6FLO6Gk54e6jDWFpQHgalgaZdZOYG3qcER+mqnKc X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04478817252c4204c3759274 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Following discussions on the mailing lists of Jena, Clerezza, Stanbol any23 I've submitted a proposal for a linked data track last week. We 're currently refining the proposal on the wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/clerezza/ApacheLDTrack Cheers, Reto --f46d04478817252c4204c3759274--