Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BC72CC73 for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 12:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88858 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2012 12:24:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apachecon-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 88771 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2012 12:24:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apachecon-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list apachecon-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 88760 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2012 12:24:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 May 2012 12:24:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nick.burch@alfresco.com designates 207.126.144.129 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.126.144.129] (HELO eu1sys200aog110.obsmtp.com) (207.126.144.129) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 04 May 2012 12:24:21 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob110.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKT6PKYSmM/K9a//jq9u8GWltcfNvN7QcQ@postini.com; Fri, 04 May 2012 12:24:01 UTC Received: by wibhn14 with SMTP id hn14so918240wib.10 for ; Fri, 04 May 2012 05:24:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=lBY04maJ3gB2/h7AHifpM1zWUYzGD+9eut0/cgHJBOk=; b=IEb4jygSQXaUTEuWvx49QjUP7S04R+GAucMlywShn7gDN3YXpSUN3OCA7aankWCPZo m/y5wY1VufCLNXgCg54jnSmSpnPVFMX/cZB2Jgu5FuG8+qyBqKbI9tcMfFtJDnm1abnz EKhwfk6uGZkuEpGd4zdsfOqW6+i7EPuKyt7iwBJi8+84pGOcu0w90XCmXqRmiETriI6K 2zPRzKo4RfNkeP+/eJP0mDEmED3HNBySzMVxNrCwkkP9QSMuTF2+H9fzkVKq/7YfXTSF 9mtHE7Fvh3NNuzvUs9/JbTJxM7gvvzkRrQmIY4WPUbQVw+eFW4DUUFr/1oJYRIwldMhn fxOQ== Received: by 10.180.104.230 with SMTP id gh6mr12377794wib.22.1336134241094; Fri, 04 May 2012 05:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urchin.earth.li (urchin.earth.li. [212.13.204.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm911356wix.0.2012.05.04.05.23.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 04 May 2012 05:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 13:23:58 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Burch X-X-Sender: nick@urchin.earth.li To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Subject: RE: ApacheCon's EU 2012 and NA 2013 - save the dates and get involved! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1336107440.1203.YahooMailNeo@web171501.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <2CDD44F49E3D47459EB0282354AE42AE280CD2032C@DEWDFECCR05.wdf.sap.corp> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn+jVlXs69LTABQfRMZQdnLQkH35pSNAwyEn19WT+G1mdXj/ZT6ZOABozfBGlJUAJljHqSV On Fri, 4 May 2012, Rich Bowen wrote: > On 2012 5 4 07:04, "Goetz, Paul" wrote: >> However: The only other option left would be CW43 = 20-22 November - >> and this is clashing with US Thanksgiving. So moving the event to late >> November would more or less exclude US committers... > > Although I have no wish to be excluded, EU events should not be planned for > the convenience of US attendees. Thats only bitten us in the past. Ignoring > JAX seems like a bad idea, and ultimately a bigger deal. SAP are kindly sponsoring us the venue and for some food, which is amazing and gives us a chance to try something different, but sadly does mean we don't have quite the same range of possible dates as when we're paying a few hundred thousand to a hotel... I'm not an American, and I don't live there, so the thanksgiving thing doesn't affect me personally. However, my hope is that we can try out some new ideas and formats in Europe, and the North America conference can learn from that. (The event in Europe will be smaller and cheaper, so we should have more chance to experiment and innovate) If we clash with thanksgiving then we'll loose the bulk of our American attendees, which likely means we loose both those with experiences of organising past ApacheCons, and we loose much of the chance for the organisers of the next one to learn from us. I completely agree that clashing with JAX isn't great, and will cause us to miss out on some German speaking attendees, which is a huge shame. (Am I right in thinking that it's all in German, so we won't loose any other European language groups?) It's very hard to judge the two, but my feeling was that loosing all the Americans (especially the ACNA13 team) would be worse. I could be wrong though (it does happen!), so if you think we've weighed the two up wrong please explain why! Nick