Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apache-bugdb-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 8409 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2002 04:08:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apache-bugdb-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: apache-bugdb@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list apache-bugdb@apache.org Received: (qmail 8395 invoked by uid 501); 25 Aug 2002 04:08:43 -0000 Date: 25 Aug 2002 04:08:43 -0000 Message-ID: <20020825040843.8394.qmail@apache.org> To: apache-bugdb@apache.org, rbb@apache.org, rsk@brightmail.com From: rbb@apache.org Subject: Re: general/8554: snprintf with precision implemented improperly [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need] [to include in the Cc line and make sure the] [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ] [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or ] ["Re: general/1098:"). If the subject doesn't match this ] [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored. The ] ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from ] [the database automatically because of the potential for mail ] [loops. If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a ] [developer. Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ] Synopsis: snprintf with precision implemented improperly State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: rbb State-Changed-When: Sat Aug 24 21:08:43 PDT 2002 State-Changed-Why: Fixed in CVS, this will be available in the next version of APR. I made a couple of small changes to your patch to better fit the Apache style. I am not fixing this in Apache 1.3, because that version of ap_snprintf really can't be used outside of Apache, and Apache doesn't suffer from this problem.