Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apache-bugdb-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 11634 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2002 19:50:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apache-bugdb-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: apache-bugdb@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list apache-bugdb@apache.org Received: (qmail 11605 invoked by uid 501); 20 Mar 2002 19:50:00 -0000 Date: 20 Mar 2002 19:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020320195000.11604.qmail@apache.org> To: apache-bugdb@apache.org Cc: apache-bugdb@apache.org, From: Sebastian Leske Subject: Re: mod_negotiation/10092: Proposed improvements for documentation on Content Negotiation Reply-To: Sebastian Leske The following reply was made to PR mod_negotiation/10092; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sebastian Leske To: slive@apache.org Cc: apbugs@apache.org Subject: Re: mod_negotiation/10092: Proposed improvements for documentation on Content Negotiation Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:44:29 +0100 Hi, On 2002/03/14 slive@apache.org wrote: > Synopsis: Proposed improvements for documentation on Content Negotiation > > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > State-Changed-By: slive > State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 14 13:34:00 PST 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > > Thanks. Your changes have been committed (with a few adjustments) and > will be included in the next release. Thank you for your quick work. One more thing: I noticed you only included my additions in the 1.3 version of the documentation. The 2.0 version of the docs, which appears to be in a different CVS directory (namely here: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-docs-2.0/manual/content-negotiation.html ), contains an almost identical document on Content negotiation, so maybe it would make sense to include my additions there as well? Keep up the good work! Greetings, Sebastian Leske