www-apache-bugdb mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From m...@apache.org
Subject Re: config/8245: SSI-parsed document has no last-modified info in header.
Date Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:19:09 GMT
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need]
[to include <apbugs@Apache.Org> in the Cc line and make sure the]
[subject line starts with the report component and number, with ]
[or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or      ]
["Re: general/1098:").  If the subject doesn't match this       ]
[pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored.  The       ]
["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from  ]
[the database automatically because of the potential for mail   ]
[loops.  If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
[nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a  ]
[developer.  Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS!     ]

Synopsis: SSI-parsed document has no last-modified info in header.

State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: marc
State-Changed-When: Mon Aug 27 09:19:08 PDT 2001
Apache can not and will not be configured by default to LIE about the last-modified date.
 That will break a lot of things and simply is not the correct thing to do.  The last modified
date represents the resource, not whatever script or program is used to generate it.

See the mod_include docs for information on how you can have it add a last-modified date which,
in some situations, can be considered valid.  However it would be bogus of Apache to do so
by default and would cause people to see stale content.

View raw message