Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apache-bugdb-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 62518 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2000 10:03:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apache-bugdb-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: apache-bugdb@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list apache-bugdb@apache.org Received: (qmail 62491 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2000 10:03:05 -0000 Received: from cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk (195.92.195.171) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2000 10:03:05 -0000 Received: from [195.92.198.123] (helo=mail17.svr.pol.co.uk) by cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 13quja-0004ID-00; Wed, 01 Nov 2000 10:03:06 +0000 Received: from modem-93.aman.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.103.93] helo=inputplus.demon.co.uk) by mail17.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 13qujZ-00002H-00; Wed, 01 Nov 2000 10:03:05 +0000 Received: from inputplus (ralph@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inputplus.demon.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA31410; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:41:30 GMT Message-Id: <200010312241.WAA31410@inputplus.demon.co.uk> To: fanf@apache.org cc: apache-bugdb@apache.org Subject: Re: documentation/6767: Affect of HUP on Child Processes Not Documented. In-Reply-To: Message from fanf@apache.org of "31 Oct 2000 19:30:30 GMT." <20001031193030.82113.qmail@locus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:41:30 +0000 From: Ralph Corderoy X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thanks for the prompt reply. Perhaps a warning that the current behaviour is unsupported implementation detail would stop Linux distributors, like Red Hat, from using `killall -HUP httpd' in their logrotate configuration. Ralph.