www-apache-bugdb mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ged Haywood <...@jubileegroup.co.uk>
Subject general/5628: I can't understand your version numbering system.
Date Sun, 23 Jan 2000 14:49:43 GMT

>Number:         5628
>Category:       general
>Synopsis:       I can't understand your version numbering system.
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache
>State:          open
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Jan 23 06:50:00 PST 2000
>Originator:     ged@jubileegroup.co.uk
>Release:        All
This ain't a bug report but it says I should use the form for odd
comments in apache/docs/ABOUT_APACHE.
I am sure that many people have the same trouble.
Surely it would make more sense if release "1.3.11" was an
EARLIER release than "1.3.9".  People searching archives
and directories would have a better chance.

PS: Thanks several million for Apache!
Kind regards,
Ged Haywood.

2.0.00 -> development -> 2.0.01
2.3.90 -> development -> 2.3.91
2.3.99 -> development -> 2.4.xx!
 [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need]
 [to include <apbugs@Apache.Org> in the Cc line and make sure the]
 [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ]
 [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or      ]
 ["Re: general/1098:").  If the subject doesn't match this       ]
 [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored.  The       ]
 ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from  ]
 [the database automatically because of the potential for mail   ]
 [loops.  If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
 [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a  ]
 [developer.  Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS!     ]

View raw message