www-apache-bugdb mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tom Vaughan <tvaug...@aventail.com>
Subject general/4197: FYI - inodes in etags will not be the same in _replicated_ content.
Date Tue, 06 Apr 1999 00:05:16 GMT

>Number:         4197
>Category:       general
>Synopsis:       FYI - inodes in etags will not be the same in _replicated_ content.
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Apr  5 17:10:01 PDT 1999
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     tvaughan@aventail.com
>Organization:
apache
>Release:        1.3
>Environment:
n/a
>Description:
I attended WCW'99, http://www.ircache.net/Cache/Workshop99/, last week.
During which, Craig Willis, http://www.cs.wpi.edu/~cew/, gave a presentation,
http://www.ircache.net/Cache/Workshop99/Papers/wills-abstract.html,
on the cachability of web resources.

He mentioned that _identical_ resources which are replicated on more than one
server will have different etags, because a resource's inode is used to 
calculate its etag. This will be a problem when these servers sit behing a 
reverse proxy. Not sure how much of a problem though.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <apbugs@Apache.Org> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED.  This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
[If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
[nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ]
[from a developer.                                      ]
[Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS!         ]




Mime
View raw message