www-apache-bugdb mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Urban <ur...@rto.dec.com>
Subject documentation/2967: use of the term "OSF1" is confusing...
Date Mon, 07 Sep 1998 18:30:49 GMT

>Number:         2967
>Category:       documentation
>Synopsis:       use of the term "OSF1" is confusing...
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache
>State:          open
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Sep  7 11:40:01 PDT 1998
>Originator:     urban@rto.dec.com
>Release:        1.3.1
Digital UNIX
I know it's our own fault for renaming the operating system from OSF/1 to 
Digital UNIX, but it's now been called Digital UNIX for at least two years. The
name changed happened somewhere between v3.0 and v3.2 I think.   I think it
would be less confusing if you referred to the OS as "Digital UNIX".


[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <apbugs@Apache.Org> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED.  This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
[If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
[nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ]
[from a developer.                                      ]
[Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS!         ]

View raw message