www-apache-bugdb mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com>
Subject Re: os-freebsd/1122 (fwd)
Date Thu, 11 Sep 1997 23:50:31 GMT
The following reply was made to PR os-freebsd/1122; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>
To: Apache bugs database <apbugs@apache.org>
Subject: Re: os-freebsd/1122 (fwd)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 17:45:30 -0600 (MDT)

 
 
 
 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 16:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
 From: nsayer@quack.kfu.com
 To: marcs@znep.com
 Subject: Re: os-freebsd/1122
 
 Marc Slemko writes:
 
 > On Thu, 11 Sep 1997 nsayer@quack.kfu.com wrote:
 
 > > Marc Slemko writes:
 > >=20
 > > > Good grief.  We really don't have the time to be manually=20
 > > > jumping through hoops just to respond to you.
 > >=20
 > > Sorry. You won't have to anymore, though, having done it once.
 > > My mailbox signal:noise ratio would be about 1:20 if I didn't
 > > do it.
 
 > Oh yea?  Every time the status on the PR changes whoever changes it will
 > manually have to forward the change to you since it comes from a different
 > address.  And I have to fix the subject line again for our bug tracking
 > system, etc.  Quite annoying.=20
 
 *sigh*
 
 > >   printf("Content-Type: text/html\n\n");
 
 > Add a fflush(stdout) here.  stdout is buffered, so both child and parent
 > end up writing it.
 
 Ah. I didn't think of that. Sounds like a bug in FreeBSD's stdio code
 then. Perhaps fork() should flush first or something. IMHO it's a
 bug if one write results in double traffic just because of a fork.
 But it's nothing to do with Apache. Thanks for your time.
 
 -- 
 Nick Sayer  http://www.kfu.com/~nsayer/ | Add to /usr/include/sys/errno.h:
 nsayer [at] quack [dot] kfu [dot] com   | 
 UNSOLICITED BULK EMAIL IS UNACCEPTABLE  | #define EEMACS 666 /* Editor too big */
 AND WILL BE CONSIDERED HARASSMENT       | 
 

Mime
View raw message