www-apache-bugdb mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com>
Subject Re: mod_auth-any/1097: Several require statements in a <limit> env. ?
Date Fri, 05 Sep 1997 20:00:13 GMT
The following reply was made to PR mod_auth-any/1097; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>
To: Andreas Jung <ajung@sz-sb.de>
Subject: Re: mod_auth-any/1097: Several require statements in a <limit> env. ?
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 13:58:53 -0600 (MDT)

 
 On Fri, 5 Sep 1997, Andreas Jung wrote:
 
 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 > 
 > On Fri, 5 Sep 1997, Marc Slemko wrote:
 > 
 > > Synopsis: Several require statements in a <limit> env. ?
 > > 
 > > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
 > > State-Changed-By: marc
 > > State-Changed-When: Fri Sep  5 08:24:04 PDT 1997
 > > State-Changed-Why:
 > > No, that is not possible.  As the docs for the satisfy directive
 > > say, it controls if hostname/IP authentication is needed
 > > in addition to user authentication or if just one is needed.
 > > 
 > > a require user and require group statement mean both are
 > > needed.
 > > 
 > 
 > Ok, both the "require user" and the "require group" must be satisfied in
 > the sense of a logical AND. But how can one express a logical OR ?
 
 Right now, as far as I can think, you can't.  Yes, it is a shortcoming.
 
 > Logical AND makes less sense. In most cases we have a group and one
 > special user how that should have access to a special area. Do I have
 > always to create a new group for this area containing all members of the
 > group including the special user...that's a bit oversized and leads
 > to a large group file.
 
 

Mime
View raw message