Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA18576;
	Sat, 19 Jul 1997 18:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by hyperreal.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA18493;
	Sat, 19 Jul 1997 18:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 18:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199707200120.SAA18493@hyperreal.org>
From: John Harby <jharby@msn.com>
Reply-To: John Harby <jharby@msn.com>
To: apache-bugdb@apache.org
Cc: apache-bugdb@apache.org
Subject: general/887: Question - CGI in memory
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sat, 19 Jul 1997 18:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
	<199707200115.SAA18327@hyperreal.org>
Sender: apache-bugdb-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk


>Number:         887
>Category:       general
>Synopsis:       Question - CGI in memory
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache (Apache HTTP Project)
>State:          open
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Jul 19 18:20:01 1997
>Originator:     jharby@msn.com
>Organization:
apache
>Release:        1.2.1
>Environment:
Red Hat Linux 4.1, gcc, g++
>Description:
Microsoft is claiming that their IIS/ISAPI web server is superior because their CGI is loaded in memory via DLLs. I was wondering if you have heard of anyone writing a similar feature to Apache. (Thanks)
>How-To-Repeat:
n/a
>Fix:
n/
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: