Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id IAA11226; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 08:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
          by hyperreal.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id IAA11140; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 08:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 08:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199704241551.IAA11140@hyperreal.com>
To: apache-bugdb@apache.org, marc@apache.org, seraud@medias.cst.cnes.fr
From: marc@hyperreal.com
Subject: Changed information for PR protocol/473
Sender: apache-bugdb-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk

Synopsis: HTTP 1.1 200 OK response instead of HTTP 1.0 response

State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: marc
State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 24 08:51:03 PDT 1997
State-Changed-Why:
A HTTP/1.1 response to a HTTP/1.0 request is perfectly 
legitimate.  The client is broken if it does not understand
it and should be fixed.  The decision to send a HTTP/1.1
response to HTTP/1.0 requests is concious and desirable.

You can use something like:

	BrowserMatch "xxx" force-response-1.0

where xxx is the User-Agent that the broken client sends.
You should get the client fixed.