Hi Werner,
thank you for your fast response. I want to avoid to modify the content part of the wsdl types.
WS-Policy sounds like a possibilty to seperate ws-security from actual types and messages.
If genenerators are not able to use the policy extensions in wsdl yet, but a client could
see in wsdl what he has to encrypt using ws-security and manually configure wss4j would be
ok.
What are your recommendations for telling the client about needed ws-security?
It would be very kindly of you, if you could answer the other questions in my posting, too.
Regards,
Christoph
--
GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist!
NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: wss4j-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: wss4j-dev-help@ws.apache.org
|