ws-woden-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Arthur Ryman <>
Subject Re: xml commons has a QName class
Date Tue, 25 Oct 2005 04:44:49 GMT

If we only need a simple class or two them it's probably not incuring
the overhead of another dependency. Why not proceed with our own
implementation if that saves time, and then later try to eliminate
redundant code.

On 10/24/05, Jeremy Hughes <> wrote:
> I've noticed the XML commons has a QName class. It currently has an
> incorrect suid although I'm told they're going to fix that. We could
> use their QName class once it is fixed. There could be some useful XML
> utilities there - which we could/should use instead of our own
> utilities classes if they overlap in function.
> However, if the only class we could use from XML commons is QName then
> I'd like to stick with having our own so we don't require our users to
> download XML commons.
> What do you think?
> Cheers,
> Jeremy
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message