ws-woden-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Glen Daniels <g...@thoughtcraft.com>
Subject Re: xml commons has a QName class
Date Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:54:08 GMT
Folks:

Isn't javax.xml.namespace.QName built into jaxp/xerces these days?

--Glen

Arthur Ryman wrote:
> Jeremy,
> 
> If we only need a simple class or two them it's probably not incuring
> the overhead of another dependency. Why not proceed with our own
> implementation if that saves time, and then later try to eliminate
> redundant code.
> 
> On 10/24/05, Jeremy Hughes <hughesj@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>>I've noticed the XML commons has a QName class. It currently has an
>>incorrect suid although I'm told they're going to fix that. We could
>>use their QName class once it is fixed. There could be some useful XML
>>utilities there - which we could/should use instead of our own
>>utilities classes if they overlap in function.
>>
>>However, if the only class we could use from XML commons is QName then
>>I'd like to stick with having our own so we don't require our users to
>>download XML commons.
>>
>>What do you think?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Jeremy
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: woden-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: woden-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Mime
View raw message