ws-soap-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pavel Ausianik <Pavel_Ausia...@epam.com>
Subject RE: [PATCH] Simple performance tests
Date Mon, 04 Nov 2002 17:39:55 GMT
Seems like cmd was blocked
Now all files zipped


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavel Ausianik [mailto:Pavel_Ausianik@epam.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 7:30 PM
> To: 'Scott Nichol'; 'soap-dev@xml.apache.org'
> Subject: [PATCH] Simple performance tests
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> In discussion of what performance gains we got, I created a 
> very simple
> performance test, basing on existing addressbook sample 
> (files attached
> should be added to java\samples\addressbook\ dir, sorry not 
> sure how correct
> patch should be created for new files).
> 
> The test allow to run getAddress / putAddress requests in 
> cycle from several
> concurrent threads. 
> I have tested it within following environment:
> 
> 2XPIII -600, 1G of RAM, W2K
> Sun JRE 1.3.1
> Tomcat 4.0.3
> Xerces 2.x
> 
> soap libs 2.2, 2.3.1, current
> 
> The number of threads was set up to 8 (with more threads I had a
> socketException). Each test included 4000  calls
> 
> Before each test server & client SOAP lib was replaced with 
> corresponding
> version & server restarted
> 
> The test was performed once in each config, sorry had no time for more
> accurate testing, maybe someone will complete it.
> 
> The results I got following:
> 
> SOAP ver , Time to run
> 2.2 	107.091
> 2.3.1     98.841
> CUR	82.451
> 
> Best regards,
> Pavel
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott Nichol [mailto:snicholnews@scottnichol.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:17 PM
> > To: Pavel Ausianik
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve Key mapping
> > 
> > 
> > > It would be interesting if some performance measure test for whole
> > SOAP env
> > > (server / client ) could be done in comparison current lib with
> > 2.3.1...
> > 
> > I agree.  I have a list of things I would like to do with 
> > SOAP, such as
> > code improvements, new features, more interop samples, but I 
> > get time to
> > work on them in small spurts, so I know that many things on the list
> > will never get done (by me, at least).  I am not sure I will 
> > get around
> > to performance measurements any time soon, but I would love 
> to compare
> > 2.2, 2.3.1 and the current, as well as a quick comparison of tomcat,
> > jetty and resin as containers.
> > 
> > Scott Nichol
> > 
> > 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message