Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact soap-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list soap-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 67343 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2000 15:48:12 -0000 Received: from mplspop3.mpls.uswest.net (204.147.80.13) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2000 15:48:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 86946 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2000 15:42:09 -0000 Delivered-To: fixup-soap-dev@xml.apache.org@fixme Received: (qmail 86931 invoked by uid 0); 3 Nov 2000 15:42:08 -0000 Received: from dialupd197.mpls.uswest.net (HELO pop.mpls.uswest.net) (207.225.143.197) by mplspop3.mpls.uswest.net with SMTP; 3 Nov 2000 15:42:08 -0000 Message-ID: <3A02DCEC.5B7C80B@pop.mpls.uswest.net> Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 09:42:36 -0600 From: George I Matkovits Reply-To: matkovitsg@uswest.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en]C-CCK-MCD {U S WEST.net} (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: soap-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Dug Davis for committer References: <005501c044de$92952410$4e5c0209@watson.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 Regards - George Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > I'd like to propose that Dug be made a committer to get the provider > type generalization done. Vahe, was the code you posted (which never > got committed) also doing the same thing? If so we need to unify > the two approaches. My recollection is that it was a pretty nifty > way of doing EJB integration. If you'd like to work on merging the > two things and getting it all in I'll be happy to nominate you for > committer status too. > > Other comitters please ack/nack. > > +1 > > Sanjiva.