Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact soap-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list soap-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 63564 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2000 05:49:25 -0000 Received: from virginia.yamato.ibm.co.jp (203.141.89.165) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2000 05:49:25 -0000 Received: from ns.trl.ibm.com (ns.trl.ibm.com [9.116.48.18]) by virginia.yamato.ibm.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W/GW3.3) with ESMTP id OAA08344 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:48:59 +0900 Received: from localhost by ns.trl.ibm.com (8.9.3/TRL4.5SRV) id OAA53454; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:48:59 +0900 To: soap-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: RE: Commit of the fixes and extensions (WAS Re: Request for two n ew locus IDs) In-Reply-To: <51C6625F6F63D211853B0008C74C1A1E01545F84@corp-exchg-001.synchrony.net> References: <51C6625F6F63D211853B0008C74C1A1E01545F84@corp-exchg-001.synchrony.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20001101144830B.neyama@trl.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 14:48:30 +0900 From: Ryo Neyama X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 41 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nelson, From: "Nelson, Christopher" Subject: RE: Commit of the fixes and extensions (WAS Re: Request for two n ew locus IDs) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:57:51 -0500 > Can you send the attachments again? I would like to see the code. I'll send you the attachments as a private mail later. > It > sounds like your needs would be having a preprocessing handler. Is this > true? Yes. That's right. > There are many proposals floating around to do this, and we should > probably try to merge these and get something in the code ASAP. I think it > would be a very good idea to have it driven by the Deployment Descriptor. > I've looked at this code and it shouldn't be too bad to do this, I think. Yes. I agree with you. In my understanding the work is driven in the context of Apache SOAP V3, right? My needs is to insert preprocessors of SOAP headers in V2, too. Although the transport hook extension seems to be a "rushed" job, I think it is reasonable in the sense of compatibility (there is no need to change applications for conformity to the extension) and flexibility (Developers can insert any hook in hook, for example XSLT stylesheet, SAX event handler, Base-64 encoder/decoder, and so on). > Are you able to attend the IRC chat today? We could hash things out > there... I'm sorry I couldn't attend the chat. I haven't read your e-mail yesterday. Regards, Ryo Neyama @ IBM Research, Tokyo Research Laboratory Internet Technology neyama@trl.ibm.co.jp