ws-soap-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yuhichi Nakamura" <NAKAM...@jp.ibm.com>
Subject RE: Potential F2F design session for 3.0?
Date Fri, 10 Nov 2000 08:38:23 GMT

James,
+1

p.s.
I just want to make sure.  I do not disagree with you at all.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
SOAP has a specifcation, but XP just started, so no specifaction is
provided.
So do you mean that we support multiple protocols such as SOAP, ebXML,
etc. at this moment, and we will follow a specification which comes from
XML Protocol work?
We have a big umbrella like Web Services, and have sub-projects like
Engine,
Service Description, etc.  Is it right?

Yuhichi Nakamura
IBM Research, Tokyo Research Laboratory
Tel: +81-46-215-4668
FAX: +81-46-215-7413


From: "James Snell" <jsnell@lemoorenet.com> on 2000/11/10 15:14

Please respond to soap-dev@xml.apache.org

To:   <soap-dev@xml.apache.org>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Potential F2F design session for 3.0?



Mandate given. Seems like this project is now about SOAP & XP, or even more
broadly, it is about providing a Web Services development architecture that
is capable of supporting multiple XML-based protocols.  Would everyone
agree?

- James

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM [mailto:rubys@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:16 PM
To: soap-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Potential F2F design session for 3.0?


Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>
> *We* decide what this project is about and I suggested a
> few weeks ago that we should track the XML Protocol work
> and got many +1s and no disagreements. Who else needs to
> say anything about what this project does??

I'll go a step further.  Apache agreed to host this project based on my
promise that this work would track the W3C standard.

- Sam Ruby






Mime
View raw message