ws-soap-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yuhichi Nakamura" <>
Subject RE: Potential F2F design session for 3.0?
Date Fri, 10 Nov 2000 08:38:23 GMT


I just want to make sure.  I do not disagree with you at all.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
SOAP has a specifcation, but XP just started, so no specifaction is
So do you mean that we support multiple protocols such as SOAP, ebXML,
etc. at this moment, and we will follow a specification which comes from
XML Protocol work?
We have a big umbrella like Web Services, and have sub-projects like
Service Description, etc.  Is it right?

Yuhichi Nakamura
IBM Research, Tokyo Research Laboratory
Tel: +81-46-215-4668
FAX: +81-46-215-7413

From: "James Snell" <> on 2000/11/10 15:14

Please respond to

To:   <>
Subject:  RE: Potential F2F design session for 3.0?

Mandate given. Seems like this project is now about SOAP & XP, or even more
broadly, it is about providing a Web Services development architecture that
is capable of supporting multiple XML-based protocols.  Would everyone

- James

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM []
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: Potential F2F design session for 3.0?

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> *We* decide what this project is about and I suggested a
> few weeks ago that we should track the XML Protocol work
> and got many +1s and no disagreements. Who else needs to
> say anything about what this project does??

I'll go a step further.  Apache agreed to host this project based on my
promise that this work would track the W3C standard.

- Sam Ruby

View raw message