ws-soap-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mathew, Suresh" <Suresh.Mat...@fmr.com>
Subject RE: Proposal: codebase for 3.0 architecture
Date Tue, 07 Nov 2000 13:48:27 GMT
Yes it is very important to us, who work in the financial industry to have
interoperabality from COM clients inorder to consider this as a viable
technology/architecure. So I hope you will have COM mplementations ...


regards,

Suresh Mathew

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Sanjiva Weerawarana [SMTP:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 07, 2000 3:47 AM
> To:	soap-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject:	Re: Proposal: codebase for 3.0 architecture
> 
> IMO COM is very important .. a large portion of the world are Win32
> developers and if Apache XYZ (new name, TBD) supports only the Java
> world then we're losing a big potential user base. Just because
> Win32 is owned by MS, that doesn't mean that only their software 
> will be used on that platform .. Apache Web server is proof that 
> other others can make it too. As we've seen with the various SOAP
> implementations, interoperability is still an issue and it'll be good
> to have an open-source implementation which attempts to provide
> an unbiased interpretation of the spec.
> 
> I'd like to see v3.0 support the "pluggable providers" concept (in
> both the Java and C++ implementations) so that we can support other
> components like .Net stuff to later.
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Yuhichi Nakamura" <NAKAMURY@jp.ibm.com>
> To: <soap-dev@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 2:57 AM
> Subject: RE: Proposal: codebase for 3.0 architecture
> 
> 
> > 
> > James,
> > Thanks.  I am not sure how many people do not like COM, but it should
> > be useful for proceeding our discussion.
> > 
> > p.s.  Jacek is working on "Idooxoap."  I am very sorry.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Yuhichi Nakamura
> > IBM Research, Tokyo Research Laboratory
> > Tel: +81-46-215-4668
> > FAX: +81-46-215-7413
> > 
> > 
> > From: "James Snell" <jsnell@lemoorenet.com> on 2000/11/07 16:23
> > 
> > Please respond to soap-dev@xml.apache.org
> > 
> > To:   <soap-dev@xml.apache.org>
> > cc:
> > Subject:  RE: Proposal: codebase for 3.0 architecture
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I will also be producing a COM-based implementation that addresses many
> of
> > the concepts that we (myself, Glen, the IBM guys, and others) have been
> > discussing for v3.  It is in COM simply because that is what I know best
> :
> > -)
> > .... so those of you who hate COM... sorry :-)
> > 
> > Anyway, I will post some my comments about the architecture tomorrow
> > morning.
> > 
> > - James
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yuhichi Nakamura [mailto:NAKAMURY@jp.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 5:59 AM
> > To: soap-dev@xml.apache.org
> > Subject: Proposal: codebase for 3.0 architecture
> > 
> > 
> > Folks,
> > IBM Tokyo Research Lab. team is pleased to post our codebase for SOAP V3
> > architecture discussion.
> > We have implemented a framework for configuring header handlers
> (including
> > digital signature and logger),
> > incorporating the concept of intermediary hosts in SOAP specification.
> We
> > also take account of
> > "transpor-agnostic" nature of SOAP.  I hope you can play with it so as
> to
> > give us feedbacks.
> > More importantly, we want to contribute to V3 architecture design with
> this
> > functional
> > codebase.  (We have developed a customer solution based on our
> platform.)
> > 
> > I think that Glen will post his codebase soon, and Jacek has SOAP
> > implementaion (Idoox).  What else
> > should we look at?
> > 
> > p.s. This package does not include api doc to reduce the size.  A
> complete
> > package will be published
> > on our web site soon.
> > 
> > Thank you very much in advance.
> > 
> > Ryo Neyama
> > Yuhichi Nakamura
> > 
> > IBM Research, Tokyo Research Laboratory
> > 
> > (See attached file: TRLSOAP07.zip)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 

Mime
View raw message