ws-soap-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanj...@watson.ibm.com>
Subject name for 3.0 stuff (was: Re: Potential F2F design session for 3.0?)
Date Thu, 09 Nov 2000 11:25:08 GMT
Eventually this stuff has to grow in scope to cover related things like
WSDL tooling, UDDI-related stuff etc. to be really a Web services
infrastructure (which is what app developers really need IMO; the
transport part is obviously necessary, but not sufficient). How about 
calling the new thing "Apache Web Services Project" and under that 
create a sub-project called "Runtime Engine" as James suggested. 
We could call it the "Web Services" project for a short version.

That'd leave room for us to grow without having to another re-org. 
Even if Apache doesn't become the host for some of the other stuff
(for e.g., I think there's an open-source UDDI project on sourceforge
already), the umbrella is an accurate description and from an Apache
Software Foundation point-of-view a location to host a collection of
related projects.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM" <rubys@us.ibm.com>
To: <soap-dev@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 3:30 PM
Subject: RE: Potential F2F design session for 3.0?


> Jean-Noel Gadreau wrote:
> >
> > until we get the new CVS module
> 
> My read of the relevant discussion to date is that there is consensus that
> there should be a different name than soap, but there isn't consent on what
> the name should be.
> 
> Of the names mentioned to date, my favorite is WASP - I don't care what the
> acronym stands for (if anything), but Apache projects tend to be names not
> acronyms.
> 
> It would be nice if we could get this issues resolved...
> 
> - Sam Ruby
> 


Mime
View raw message