ws-scout-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: jUDDI decoupling changes in.
Date Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:02:32 GMT
why does it have to be "1.0"?

Why not we just do a release as is, update the version to 0.6, and go 
with that?

(Or I can get off my kiester and get the last bit in there :)

Fernando Nasser wrote:
> ObejectWeb needs the Scout 1.0 with this changes to incorporate in their 
> J2EE AppServer, JOnAS.
> 
> Anyone knows when 1.0 will be available?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Regards,
> Fernando
> 
> 
> Deepak Bhole wrote:
>> On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 08:56 -0800, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>
>>> We have to get the changes in and stabilize the trunk.  We have one
>>> small item of providing async support before we roll out the 1.0
>>> release.
>>>
>>> Deepak Bhole <dbhole@apache.org> wrote:
>>>        On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 12:16 -0800, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>>        > I think we should integrate the generated uddi types as
>>>        Scout types so
>>>        > that the external jar is removed.
>>>        >        >               Sounds good. It'd prevent having to 
>>> move around that extra
>>>        jar. I will
>>>        make the changes and commit them.
>>>               Deepak
>>>               
>>
>>
>> It's already done. That was the commit that I did on that day (The
>> 17th). Whatever needed to go into the trunk from my side is in there
>> now.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Deepak
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: scout-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: scout-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Mime
View raw message