Hi all,
WSS4J trunk now has the following modules and package names:
parent
bindings -> org.apache.ws.security.binding.*
policy -> org.apache.ws.security.policy.*
ws-security-common -> org.apache.ws.security.common.*
ws-security-dom -> org.apache.ws.security.dom.*
ws-security-stax -> org.apache.ws.security.stax.*
ws-security-policy-stax -> org.apache.ws.security.policy.stax.*
They will probably undergo a few more changes before the release. Should we move to use org.apache.wss4j instead of org.apache.ws.security as suggested by Andreas here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-350
If we changed the package names, that should allow WSS4J 2.0 and 1.6 to co-exist, right? Thus, things like CXF could keep the 1.6 based code around for a release or so while users migrate. If that's the case, I'd support it. :-)