Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ws-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ws-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FD9B4774 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:55:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4690 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 15:55:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 4367 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 15:55:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ws.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 4360 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 15:55:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:55:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lmandel@ca.ibm.com designates 32.97.182.144 as permitted sender) Received: from [32.97.182.144] (HELO e4.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.144) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 15:55:37 +0000 Received: from d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (d01relay06.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.116]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p4HFYQiw014162 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:34:26 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p4HFtGiC1425542 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:55:16 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p4HFtG81009610 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:55:16 -0400 Received: from d25ml04.torolab.ibm.com (d25ml04.torolab.ibm.com [9.26.6.105]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p4HFtF0E009592 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 11:55:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: To: dev@ws.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Woden] Moving to Java 5 and dropping woden-qname module X-KeepSent: 864BFCB5:DD6B798F-85257893:00575695; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.2FP3 SHF32 December 02, 2009 From: Lawrence Mandel Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:55:10 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML04/25/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 05/17/2011 11:55:14, Serialize complete at 05/17/2011 11:55:14 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0057743E85257893_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 0057743E85257893_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" +1 If any Woden consumer has a hard dependency on Java 1.4 please speak up now. Lawrence From: Sagara Gunathunga To: dev@ws.apache.org Date: 05/17/2011 08:45 AM Subject: [Woden] Moving to Java 5 and dropping woden-qname module Hi devs, Since some of the projects moving to Java 6 this is a very late discussion to have :) BTW these are the two modification I suggest for Woden. 1.) Moving to support Java 5 officially. 2.) With above change no need to keep woden-qname module that has single class (QName ). Earlier there were some incompatible issues reported with JDK QName class and moved Woden's QName class in to a optional module. Any objection ? Thanks ! -- Sagara Gunathunga Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org --=_alternative 0057743E85257893_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
+1

If any Woden consumer has a hard dependency on Java 1.4 please speak up now.

Lawrence


From: Sagara Gunathunga <sagara.gunathunga@gmail.com>
To: dev@ws.apache.org
Date: 05/17/2011 08:45 AM
Subject: [Woden] Moving to Java 5 and dropping woden-qname module





Hi devs,

Since some of the projects moving to Java 6 this is a very late
discussion to have :)  BTW these are the two modification I suggest
for Woden.

1.) Moving to support Java 5 officially.

2.) With above change no need to keep woden-qname module that has
single class (QName ).  Earlier there were some incompatible issues
reported with JDK QName class and moved Woden's QName class in to a
optional module.


Any objection ?

Thanks !

--
Sagara Gunathunga

Blog -
http://ssagara.blogspot.com
Web -
http://people.apache.org/~sagara/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org



--=_alternative 0057743E85257893_=--