Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40655 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 22:42:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Nov 2010 22:42:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 11586 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 22:43:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 11249 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2010 22:43:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ws.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 11241 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2010 22:43:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:43:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.49] (HELO mail-bw0-f49.google.com) (209.85.214.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:43:18 +0000 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so1111678bwz.22 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:42:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mkL+iRVilDg7iSeqS2CwJPc0gJ4USDbVGmTc9PbDgR4=; b=H7BlTDgB42kNQ5RKW6qB/kvVRozNgemdf+CgkZYzf8BZQmbW80A45/ZbpG1xo5P/qs /S2DclQ4BG/5xp7nr/y2gnWjO2uFDItgwxTkhi+4NHJA+0Li4/U0/NAFk0dEKUFvw2vk sDUA36aa1UVN0SmW66iQnRPd6a1u0NFl9sB1g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QGO2aimK3ce4m2o0yv3pDtJ8yaYgbSOp+rP7vU8j+o48Mz+rFv1hbCsxqn+Bcg39QO nZCHnLjBb8r7wPZVSM59ZbF4p6wZapbhY4GuOY01HyLU8lXiTGAq4HWqx5XjrN6wBIug 5clj8i1i11J5Uymd00eoVsbPr2NODrJGqb478= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.71.83 with SMTP id g19mr8366173bkj.158.1288824176658; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.78.79 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:42:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CD1DEF9.2030809@ifad.dk> References: <201010222138.53414.dkulp@apache.org> <4CD1DEF9.2030809@ifad.dk> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:42:56 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Welcome to dev@ws.apache.org From: Benson Margulies To: dev@ws.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lars, This is a dev list for an Apache project that hosts several small modules. There are not enough developers involved in any one of the individual projects to support independent mailing lists. No one here is 'professional'. We are all volunteers. If you are not interested in our internal developmental deliberations, then you are welcome to stick to the user list, which will be much lighter in traffic. Best Regards Benson Margulies On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Lars Schnoor wrote: > Hi > > I originally signed up for the XML-RPC mailing list because that was the > project that was and still is interesting to me. In the last couple of da= ys > however I have been bombarded with SPAM from all kinds of Apache projects > that I am not interested in at all. At some point someone asked if it was= a > mistake to merge the Apache mailing lists and a couple of people replied > that they actually =C2=A0think that it indeed was a big mistake and that = was it, > no action whatsoever. > So my question is very simple, is there some professional person that can > see that it was a very bad idea to merge the mailing lists and is willing= to > undo this mistake, or do we people that don't what our mailboxes filled-u= p > with unrelated SPAM, have to unsubscribe? > And Lawrence, was there any point in your message asking if it was a > mistake? > > Lars > > On 23-10-2010 03:38, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >> The lists should now all be merged into just dev@ and users@. =C2=A0 Thu= s, >> welcome >> to the new "combined" WS community! >> >> We left the Muse lists alone for right now. =C2=A0Did we reach a concens= us to >> archive Muse? =C2=A0I wasn't 100% possitive so we left those alone for r= ight >> now. >> >