Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91123 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2010 00:11:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2010 00:11:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 4784 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 00:12:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 4606 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2010 00:12:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ws.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 4598 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2010 00:12:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:12:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.85.173.253] (HELO server.dankulp.com) (64.85.173.253) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:12:13 +0000 Received: by server.dankulp.com (Postfix, from userid 5000) id 0F3B318707E; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:11:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on server.dankulp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Msg-File: /tmp/mailfilter-dev@ws.apache.org.kGswrTj0Xg Received: from dilbert.dankulp.com (unknown [38.110.32.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.dankulp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33E1118707B; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:11:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Kulp To: dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Welcome to dev@ws.apache.org Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:11:38 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36; KDE/4.5.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Lars Schnoor References: <201010222138.53414.dkulp@apache.org> <4CD1DEF9.2030809@ifad.dk> In-Reply-To: <4CD1DEF9.2030809@ifad.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011032011.38626.dkulp@apache.org> X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 On Wednesday 03 November 2010 6:15:21 pm Lars Schnoor wrote: > Hi > > I originally signed up for the XML-RPC mailing list because that was the > project that was and still is interesting to me. In the last couple of > days however I have been bombarded with SPAM from all kinds of Apache > projects that I am not interested in at all. At some point someone asked > if it was a mistake to merge the Apache mailing lists and a couple of > people replied that they actually think that it indeed was a big > mistake and that was it, no action whatsoever. > So my question is very simple, is there some professional person that > can see that it was a very bad idea to merge the mailing lists and is > willing to undo this mistake, or do we people that don't what our > mailboxes filled-up with unrelated SPAM, have to unsubscribe? > And Lawrence, was there any point in your message asking if it was a > mistake? This was NOT a mistake, at least not for the dev lists. ALL of the developers (well, speicifically the PMC members) are tasked with the oversight of the ENTIRE ws project, not a small subset or single project in it. As such, the developers need to be aware of everything that is going on in all of the projects. The BEST model to look at is the commons project at Apache. They have a very diverse set of sub projects and have been very successful at being able to provide adequate oversight on all the projects. How do they do it: they MANDATE that there are not separate dev lists for each project. If the traffic about a particulare subproject grows enough to overwelm the rest of the projects, that's usually a sign that it's ready to spin out. Thus, if you don't like it, start participating with XML-RPC, submit patches, foster ideas, etc.... and help it grow to a point where it's ready to graduate. Dan > > Lars > > On 23-10-2010 03:38, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > The lists should now all be merged into just dev@ and users@. Thus, > > welcome to the new "combined" WS community! > > > > We left the Muse lists alone for right now. Did we reach a concensus to > > archive Muse? I wasn't 100% possitive so we left those alone for right > > now. -- Daniel Kulp dkulp@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog